General Education Curriculum

Program Review

May 1996

VII. Acknowledgments

As mentioned previously, this report was written by the members of the General Education Curriculum Review Committee. Specifically, the author(s) of each section are as follows.

I. Demand for and Reputation of the Program

A. Program Mission

B. Centrality to & Support of the University Mission

C. National and Local Enrollment Trends

D. Curricular Currency

E. Responsiveness to Change

F. Effectiveness in Serving Minorities & Other Special Populations

II. Quality of the Program

A. Design

B. Faculty

C. Student Outcomes

D. Administration

E. Environmental Trends Affecting Program

III. Costs of the Program--Bob Wismer

IV. Compliance with Board of Governor's Policy 1990-05--Bob Wismer

V. Five-Year Plan for Major Resource Needs--Committee

VI. Recommended Action Plan--Committee

Dr. Judi Roller and Ms. Dawn White read the entire report and commented extensively on it. The immediate past chair of the committee, Dr. Karen Brooks, offered extensive comments on a draft version of the document. Dr. Jan M. Shepherd summarized the resuts of the 1992 fall faculty survey into Appendix A. Drs. Amber Lo and Yvonne King designed, administered, statistically analyzed, and presented the 1995 fall student survey. Dr. Bonnie Duncan performed literature research to enable the committee members to place Jerry Gaff's work in proper perspective. And despite being elected to the committee just three months before this report was submitted, Prof. Marjorie White contributed extensively to the committee's final discussions.

Introduction
I. Demand for and Reputation of Program
II. Quality of the Program
III. Costs of the Program
IV. Compliance with Board of Governors Policy
V. Five-Year Plan for Major Resource Needs
VI. Recommended Action Plan

Return to Table of Contents
Return to Faculty Senate Home Page
Return to MU Home Page