Millersville University, Faculty Senate
MINUTES
FACULTY SENATE MEETING
7 November 1995
Prior Minutes
Reports
...| Chairperson
| Student Senate
| VP Acad Affairs
| Assoc VP Acad Affairs
|
Committee Reports
...| Academic Policies
| General Education Review
| University Theme
| Joint Senate Conference
| Outcome Assessment
| Proposed Courses
|
Business
...| Psychology Major
| Election Procedure
| Selection of Gen Ed Task Force
|
Chairperson D. Eidam called the meeting to order at 4:10 p.m. in Chryst
Hll, Room 210. All departmental senators attended except those from
Developmental Studies, Music, and Social Work. Student President E.
Kobeski and J. Ishler attended for the Student Senate. J. Hoffman
attended for the Snapper.
Minutes
Senate approved the 17 October 1995 meeting
minutes without corrections.
Reports
Chairperson's Report
chairperson D. Eidam announced that henceforth the agenda and minutes
will appear as one package. Senator T. Woo requested a change in the
agenda order: current item X to become item IX and current item IX to
become item X. She also asked that senate delete the Mathematics
Department Prerequisite Changes from the agenda.
Chairperson Eidam asked senate consent to add an item XII to the agenda.
APSCUF has proposed but not had approved that senate must select four
faculty members to the Task Froce on the General Education Curriculum and
its Resources. Meet and Discuss meets next Monday at which time
hopefully they will approve the APSCUF proposal. No matter what happens
next Monday, senate needs to be ready to select the faculty members for
the task force. Eidam would like senate to discuss eligibility
restrictions, etc. for senate elected members of the task force.
Eidam sent a letter to the Provost requesting a clarification (see
Attachment A). In the governance manual under course modification, there
are guidelines for whether a course change is determined as minor or
major. There are no guidelines that tell whether a proposed curriculum
change is minor or major. There is only the phrase that questions
regarding whether a change is major or minor shall be referred to the
Provost. Eidam is requesting that the Provost clarify what guidelines are
used. The Provost could refer the matter back to senate and let it
develop guidelines.
APSCUF president S. Centola has sent a letter to the members of the
Academic Policies Committee and University Course and Program Review
Committee. He is requesting a meeting on 15 November at 4 PM to discuss
contractual concerns relating to development of nontraditional
interdisciplinary or interdepartmental programs. T. Madonna and D. Eidam
are also invited.
One new Associate Provost candidate is back on campus. Eidam was asked
to meet and speak with her for an hour in his office. The faculty senate
leadership is often asked to meet with search candidates and sometimes
with the council of trustees. Eidam interprets the senate "leadership"
to mean senate officers. if senators have a better idea of how to
interpret senate "leadership," please contact Eidam.
Student Senate
Student Senate President E. Kobeski said student senate presdients met
over the weekend. Student senate is looking into raising student
activity fees. Requests for funds last year were much greater than what
student senate had available. Student senate is searching for a new
student trustee. The current student trustee will graduate this year.
Administrative Officers
Vice-President for Academic Affairs
Provost F. McNairy thanked chairperson Ediam for meeting with the
associate provost candidate. MU is interviewing candidates for the dean
of the School of Humanities and Social Sciences. There will be
candidates this and next week. Hopefully the search committee will make
its recommendations soon.
McNairy reminded senators of the science lectureship program next
thursday evening. There are still some seats available. the Social Work
program will have a program for its reaccreditation on thursday. MU's
accreditation will last until the year 2003 with no restrictions. MU is
proud of that recognition.
Chairperson D. Eidam noted that the administration invited faculty senate
leadership to interview the candidates for the dean of Humanities and
Social Sciences. Eidam did not feel it was appropriate for him to
represent senate in a search for a shcool dean. He declined to attend
those interviews.
Chairperson D. Eidam recognized senator M. Margolis. Margolis said that
in early September, senate approved an Economics Department course EC327:
Women and Global Economic Development. Because of the moratorium on new
courses, the administration has not approved it. The Economics
Department would like to ask the administration for a special exception
for the course. Margolis gave these reasons for the special request: the
course is part of the Women's Studies Program, its development stage and
shepherding through the approval process took over three years of work by
Professor Leela, and a high probability that a new member of the
Economics Department will want to teach the course after Professor S.
Leela retires. professor Leela attended a special workshop to develop
Perspective courses in Women's studies.
In response Provost McNairy said the Economics Department request for a
special exception was the first to come to her attention since the
moratorium began. She suggested that the department send a written
justification for the special exception through the traditional course
approval process. MU does not want to create a new process.
Senator Margolis introduced Professor S. Leela who proposed the course
and spoke in favor of the special exception. She stressed the course's
importance notwithstanding the fact that she will retire in December.
The Women's Studies program does not include an economics course. She
first proposed the course in 1992 and worked steadily for over three
years to develop the course and go through the approval process. She
hoped the administration would approve the course after it once again
goes through the approval process this time for the special exception.
Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs
Associate Vice-Presdient for Academic Affairs J. Stager reminded senators
that registration begins next week, November 13-17. As it has done over
the last three years, MU is trying to provide students with advising help
on site. It is also attempting to get chairs and deans to volunteer.
Today Stager mailed a request for voluntters to faculty. The greatest
need for advisor help is Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday.
Senator M. Gray-Schlegel asked what the new 999 designation means.
Stager replied that students who are planning to graduate in May indicate
so by entering 999 on their registration card. This gives the
Administration more advanced notice of when students plan to graduate.
The traditional deadline for applying for graduation is February 15.
This method gives the Administration more advanced notice of a student's
intention to graduate. The Administration will know who plans to
graduate before the Spring semester begins.
Senator W. Dorman asked if the administration could move registration
week to a different time than the student evaluation of the faculty
week. Stager responded that the student evaluation of faculty is
mandated to be the twelfth week of the semester. In reducing the time
that students can register, the Administration chose the third of the
previous three weeks of registration. Stager said he would take under
advisement the possibility of changing student registration week.
Students may show up any time equal to or after their assigned time.
Students do not have to leave a class to register. They can register at
a later time. Senator C. Stameshkins said that in many cases students do
not know that they can register at a later point.
Committee Reports
The Academic Policies Committee
chairperson B. Nakhai was unable to attend due to illness. However, he
gave two handouts to the senate secretary to distribute to senators .
(See Attachments B and C). Nakhai asked that the subject of Academic
Honesty and Dishonesty at Millerville University be placed on the next
Senate meeting agenda.
Senator S. Thompson asked if professor should follow the proposed policy
even before Senate has approved it. Associate Vice-President for
Academic Affairs J. Stger described the old policy for Academic
Dishonesty. He said the new policy gives faculty more discretion to make
decisions. Under the new policy professors become the administrative
officer dealing with the academic dishonesty. For serious sanctions
against a student, professors must go through hearings and other proper
procedures. Stager said faculty may essentially follow the new proposed
policy for now.
General Education Review Committee
Chairperson R. Wismer said the committee polled a randomly selected and
statiscally valid group of students. Committee members questioned the
students in classes. Wismer thanked various departments and individual
faculty members for allowing the questionnairings in their classrooms.
University Theme Committee
Chairperson J. Piperberg will be sending within the next month
solicitations for the academic theme for the next gree year. the
Committee would like to receive suggestions for the theme by February 15,
1996. Senators should receive a memo soon.
Joint Senate Conference Committee
Chairperson J. Piperberg circulated a working document among Senators
that contained a list of the committees and the number of students on
that Committee. He asked that if Senators knew the information on the
document was incorrect, please make corrections. If there are any
corrections, Senators could tell Piperberg informally and at a later
point send a written confirmation. He would like to complete the
document so he can meet with the Committee and discuss it.
Outcome Assessment Committee
Chairperson R. Mainzer said the Committee had not met but he will soon be
getting in touch with committee members. He attended a leadership
seminar last Monday and Tuesday in Harrisburg on assessment outcomes.
many Universities from around the state attended.
Proposed Courses
Chairperson D. Eidam noted that page four of the documents for the
proposed course SPED671 included documents for SPED325. J. Piperberg/R.
Mainzer moved to approve the following three graduate courses:
EDTE590:
Information Literacy: Creating Independent Learners, a three semester
hour graduate course.
SPED578:
Special Education law for Students with Exceptionalities: New
Challenges for Educators, a three semester hour graduate course
SPED671:
Behavior Management: Strategy Systems for Special Education, an
existing three hour graduate course
The motion carried.
Business
Proposed Changes in the Undergraduate Psychology
Major
Senator T. Woo introduced Professor S. Luek who introduced a Proposal for
Changes in the Undergraduate Psychology Major. Luek said it was good to
return to Senate; she felt as if she were back home. She discussed the
handout that described the proposal (not attached due to its length).
Five different curriculum committees approved the proposal. The
Psychology department is the only campus department that MU requires to
go through two school Curriculum Committees. One is the School of
Education Curriculum Committee. Since Psychology Department courses
count in the School of Social Sciences, the Social Sciences Curriculum
Committee also approved the proposal.
The Psychology Department is attempting to get the changes approved so
that they may appear in the new University catalog. the first changes
involve course numbering within the Psychology major. Within the
proposal she distributed, she proposed that Senate first approve the
changes in course numbering and then consider the proposed changes in
specific aspects of the B.A. program in Psychology. The Psychology
Department requested a lowering of the course numbers in four out of five
courses. Senate approved all changes.
Reevaluation of the New Senate Election
Procedures
Senator G. Yelagotes questioned the benefits of the new method of
electing Senate Committee members used by the Senate this Fall. He did
not believe that Senate accomplished the goal it set out to achieve with
the new voting method. he said that as for himself he did not know who
the candidates were in the September election. In the old system where
Senators had to nominate the candidates, it was easier to know who the
candidates were.
G. Yelagotes/W. Dorman moved to return to the previous election procedure
and to not use the new preferntial voting procedure. Senator D. Hutchens
suggested it was still possible to have nominators introduce their
nominees under the new preferential voting system. Hutchens felt that
the new voting procedure does streamline the voting process.
The Chairperson noted that there are two issues here. One is the method
of nomination and the second is the method of voting. in the old
nomination method, Senators could only nominate from the floor of the
Senate. Parliamentarian C. Scharnberger asked for clarification of the
motion to say which of the two issues the motion makers intended.
R. Wismer/J. McCade moved to amend the Yealgotes/Dorman motion to keep
the new voting algorithm but to direct the Chairperson to provide an
opportunity for senators to become familiar with candidates (i.e. give
nominators the opportunity to introduce their nominees to Senators_
before a ballot. The motion to amend as well as the amended main motion
passed.
Selecting Members of the Task Force on the General
Education Committee
Chairperson D. Eidam noted that Senate may need to select members of the
APSCUF Task Force. (See Attachment B of the 17 October, 1995 minutes).
The selection is preliminary since meet and discuss must approve the
proposed Task Force. Attachment B calls for the Faculty Senate to select
four faculty members to the Task Force.
Eidam said it would help if Senate would decide who is eligible to serve
on the Task Force. is the Senate's contribution to the task force only
to be composed of Senators? A W. Dorman/O. iglesias motion to elect the
four Task Force members from the Senate passed. A J. Lynch/O. Iglesais
motion that at least one member of the Task Force come from the General
Education Committee and also from the Senate passed.
The following senate committee positions are currently vacant:
Humanities and Fine Arts representative to the Academic Policies Committee,
Social Sciences representative to the Academic outcomes Assessment
Committee, Academic Policies Committee, and the UCPRC,
non-School representative to the General Education Review Committee, and
an Alternate to the International Selection Committee
Senate adjourned at 5:30 PM. The next meeting will be Tuesday, 21
November 1995, from 4:05-5:45 p.m. in Chryst 210.
Respectfully submitted,
Marvin Margolis, Secretary
Faculty Senate
Prior Minutes
Reports
...| Chairperson
| Student Senate
| VP Acad Affairs
| Assoc VP Acad Affairs
Committee Reports
...| Academic Policies
| General Education Review
| University Theme
| Joint Senate Conference
| Outcome Assessment
| Proposed Courses
Business
...| Psychology Major
| Election Procedures
| Selection of Gen Ed Task Force
Top
Return to Faculty Senate Home Page
Return to MU Home Page