Millersville University, Faculty Senate
MINUTES
FACULTY SENATE
MEETING
15 April 1997
Prior Minutes
Reports
..| Chairperson
| Provost
|
Committee Reports
...| Academic Policies
| UCPRC
| University Theme
| Academic Standards
| Coop Ed
Proposed Courses
Business
...| CIRP
| Gen Ed Revision Plan
Chairperson D. Eidam called the meeting to order at 4:08 p.m. in Chryst
Hall, Room 210. All departments were represented except Art, Economics,
Educational Foundations, Foreign Languages, History, Sociology and
Anthropology, and Special Education.
Minutes
The Senate approved the 1 April 1997 minutes
with one correction: "Women's Studies Curriculum Committee" replaces
"Women's Studies Steering Committee" (p. 4191).
Reports
Chairperson's Report
Chairperson D. Eidam reminded Senators of the special meeting on 22 April
at 4:05 p.m. in Chryst 210, and he distributed an annual fund progress
report (Attachment A). He announced that
Student Senate President P. Leahy was unable to attend the day's meeting
and there would be no report from student senate. The chairperson also
said the elections for the Women's Studies Curriculum Committee would be
postponed until a list of eligible candidates was forwarded from the
Provost's Office. Committee chairs were reminded to submit refreshment
receipts for reimbursement to the chairman, and, to submit their annual
activities reports by 1 May 1997 with an electronic copy to be sent to
Senator M. Warmkessel. Item X, the introduction of "The General Education
Revision Plan" document (Attachment D), was
added to the day's agenda. Lastly, the chairperson announced the need to
elect a new Senate chairperson in December 1997. He will not be a
candidate.
Administrative Reports
Provost F. mcNairy commended the Joint Faculty and Student Senate
Conference Committee on the publication of its "Proposal for a Four Year
Contract with Students" (see Attachment A,
pp. 4196-4201, 1 April 1997 minutes).
Reports of Standing Committees
Academic Policies
Senator K. Bookmiller introduced and answered initial questions on the
"Amendment to Academic Minors Policy" (Attachment
B) which was placed on the 6 May agenda.
UCPRC
Senator R. Wismer introduced under the two meeting rule:
CHEM 381 Polymer Chemistry
CHEM 482 Polymer Physical Chemistry
MATH 471 Mathematical Modelling
OSHM 321 and OSHM 422 Environmental and Industrial Hygiene I and
II
Under the one meeting rule, he introduced the Psychology Department's
Proposal to increase credits from 30 to 33 in its three double majors.
University Academic Theme
Senator J. Piperberg, reported the committee met on 14 April and will meet
again on 21 April to hear proposals for the 2000-2001 theme. He indicated
the committee's choice would be announced at the 6 May meeting.
Academic Standards
Senator J. Piperberg anounced the summer meeting dates had been set.
Special Reports by Faculty Senate
Committees
Senator W. Dorman said he and Dianne Fleishman, Director of the
Co-op Program, had attended a professional meeting on co-op education. The
details of the activity would be in the committee's annual report.
Course and Program Approvals
The Senate approved the Option in Environmental Chemistry.
Business
CIRP
Linda Suskie, Assistant to the President for Special Projects, presented
the results of the 1996 CIRP freshman survey. The survey is administered
at orientation to students who voluntarily self-report the data. The
results of the current survey are based on a 65% response rate and compare
MU students' responses with those of other high school seniors admitted as
freshmen to four-year public institutions nationally (Attachment C). Student respondents listed MU as
their first choice for a higher education and that the university's good
academic reputation; ability of graduates to get good jobs, low tuition;
and, overall size were determinants in their selection process. Forty-five
percent of the surveyed students indicated they planned to pursue graduate
degrees. The incoming students also described themselves as:
optimistic about completing the MU degree with a B average
having a strong academic self-concept
spending more time studying (than freshmen nationally)
completing stronger curricula (than freshmen nationally
coming from homes with incomes at or over $50,000
showing or having shown signs of stress such as anger, depression,
oversleeping, and feeling overwhelmed
drinking less (than freshmen nationally
Suskie also indicated MU freshmen reported strong interests in coming to
college to gain a general education and to become a more cultured person.
Factors such as coming to college to make more money or to prove
self-worth were of declining importance while MU's reputation for placing
students in top graduate schools gained in importance among the
respondents. Suskie concluded the presentation with comparisons of male
and female students' responses to questions on topics including college
plans, social activities, academic goals, etc. citing that women
emphasized MU's academic reputation and graduates' success rates as
influences on their decisions; while men reported seeking the degree to be
well-off financially, to be an authority in their chosen field, and to be
able to start their own businesses. Senators followed-up with questions on
aspects of the results and requested the report be made available
electronically.
General Education Revisision Plan
Chairperson Eidam recognized Dr. James Sheridan who presented the General
Education Revision Plan (Attachment D), the
subject of the special meeting called for 22 April. Dr. Sheridan thanked
Judy Lintner for her support services, the General Education Task Force,
and the Senate for its participation. While reviewing the parts of the
proposal, Dr. Sheridan also acknowledged the role of Dr. Bonnie Duncan and
those members of the English Department who contributed to the broader
description of ways the "W" requirement can be fulfilled. A brief
discussion of the document ensued; then, Dr. Sheridan announced the date
of the open forum (4/28) and the referendum (4/30).
In preparation for the 22 April meeting, which the Chairperson ruled must
lead to an up or down vote on the plan pursuant to Senate and the Task
Force's operating rules, a McLeod-Peters motion to end debate at 5:15 to
allow time for the vote passed. The vote will occur earlier if debate
ceases before 5:15 p.m.
The meeting adjourned at 5:33 p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled
for 6 May 1997, 4:05-5:45 p.m. in Chryst Hall, Room 210.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Schneller
Acting Secretary
Prior Minutes
Reports
..| Chairperson
| Provost
|
Committee Reports
...| Academic Policies
| UCPRC
| University Theme
| Academic Standards
| Coop Ed
Proposed Courses
Business
...| CIRP
| Gen Ed Revision Plan
Return to Faculty Senate Home Page
Return to MU Home Page