Math 310
These problems are provided to help you study. The presence of a problem on this handout does not imply that there will be a similar problem on the test. And the absence of a topic does not imply that it won't appear on the test.
1. Let n be a positive integer, and let ,
, ...,
, and
B be sets. Prove that
2. Consider the set
Write S as a single interval in the real line and prove that your result is correct.
3. Prove that
4. Prove that
5. Define a relation on
by
Consider each axiom for an equivalence relation. If the axiom holds, prove it; if the axiom fails, give a counterexample.
6. Define a relation on
by
Consider each axiom for an equivalence relation. If the axiom holds, prove it; if the axiom fails, give a counterexample.
7. Let . A equivalence relation is defined on
by
List the elements of the equivalence classes of under this relation.
8. For each positive integer n, define a subset of by
Consider each axiom for a partition. If the axiom holds, prove it; if the axiom fails, give a counterexample.
9. Consider the relation on
whose graph is shown
below. Is
an equivalence relation?
10. A relation is defined on by
Check each axiom for an equivalence relation. If the axiom holds, prove it. If the axiom does not hold, give a specific counterexample.
11. Prove that if n is a prime number and , then
or
.
12. Prove that if , then
is either 1 or 2. Show by specific example that both cases can occur.
13. Compute . (Don't factor the numbers!)
14. Prove that if , then
.
15. (a) Let m and n be integers. Prove that
(b) Prove that if , then
.
16. Show that if , then
does not
leave a remainder of 2 when it is divided by 5.
17. (a) Find .
(b) Show that 8 does not have a multiplicative inverse mod 10.
18. Let m and n be integers, and suppose . Prove that
implies
.
19. Suppose . Is it necessarily true that
?
20. Prove that if , then
is not
divisible by 5.
21. The following functions take real numbers as inputs and produce real numbers as outputs. Taking the domain to be the largest set of valid inputs, find the domain and the range for each function.
(a) .
(b) .
(c) .
22. Define by
. Prove directly using the
definition that f is injective.
23. Define by
. Prove that f is not
injective.
24. Define by
. Prove that f is
injective.
25. Define by
. Prove that directly using
the definition that f is surjective.
26. Define by
. Prove that f is
surjective.
27. Define by
. Prove that f is injective.
Is f surjective?
28. Define by
.
Prove that f is not injective, but that f is surjective.
29. Define by
.
Prove that f is injective, but is not surjective.
30. Define by
Is f surjective? Why or why not?
31. Define by
Prove that f is bijective by constructing an inverse.
32. Define by
Prove that f is bijective by constructing an inverse.
33. Let and
be functions. Suppose f and g are
injective. Prove that the composite
is injective.
34. Give a specific example of sets X, Y, and Z and functions and
such that g is surjective, but the
composite
is not.
35. Prove that the following sets have the same cardinality by constructing a bijection from A to B:
36. Prove that has the same cardinality as
by constructing a bijection from
to
.
37. Prove that has the same cardinality as
by constructing a bijection from
to
.
1. Let n be a positive integer, and let ,
,
...,
, and B be sets. Prove that
For ,
The result is true for .
The induction step will also need the result for ,
so I'll prove it here. For
, the result says that
Now I'll prove the general result by induction. Take ,
and suppose the result is true for
. This means that
I want to prove that
The proof proceeds in the usual way by "splitting off" the
piece and applying the induction hypothesis:
(Notice that the second equality used the result for ,
which is why I needed to prove it first.) I've proved the result for
n; hence, the result is true for all
by induction.
2. Consider the set
Write S as a single interval in the real line and prove that your result is correct.
I'll show that .
First, notice that for all
, since
. This implies that
.
Next, I'll show that . Take
, so
.
Note that
In the limit definition, let . Then there is a number M such
that for
,
Then , so
.
Hence,
. This proves that
.
Since and
, it follows that
.
3. Prove that
Let , so
. Note that for
, I have
. Hence,
for
, and
for
. Therefore,
. This proves that
.
Conversely, let . This means that
for all
, so
for all
.
Suppose . I have
In the limit definition, let . Then there is a number M
such that if
,
Hence, for ,
This contradicts for all
.
It follows that . Since
, I have
, and hence
. Thus,
.
This proves that .
4. Prove that
The union on the left is .
Let . Then for some
, I have
. This means that
Hence, . This proves that
.
Conversely, suppose , so
. Now
In the limit definition, let . Then there is a number M
such that if
,
Thus, for I have
This implies that
Therefore, . This proves that
.
Hence, .
5. Define a relation on
by
Consider each axiom for an equivalence relation. If the axiom holds, prove it; if the axiom fails, give a counterexample.
Reflexivity does not hold: For example, ,
so
.
If , then
. Hence,
, and so
. Therefore, symmetry holds.
Transitivity does not hold. For example, , since
;
, since
. However,
, since
.
6. Define a relation on
by
Consider each axiom for an equivalence relation. If the axiom holds, prove it; if the axiom fails, give a counterexample.
, but
. Therefore,
The relation is not reflexive.
Suppose . Then
Therefore, . Hence, the relation is symmetric.
, since
, since
However, , since
Therefore, the relation is not transitive.
7. Let . A equivalence relation is defined on
by
List the elements of the equivalence classes of
under this relation.
There are 16 points in :
Two points are in the same equivalence class if the sums of their
components are equal mod 4. For example, ,
because
The four equivalence classes are:
8. For each positive integer n, define a subset of by
Consider each axiom for a partition. If the axiom holds, prove it; if the axiom fails, give a counterexample.
If x is a real number, there is a positive integer n such that --- and hence,
. Every point of
is
in one of the
's.
On the other hand, for every positive integer n, so
for all n. There are points which are in more than
one
--- in fact, in infinitely many of the
's.
Thus, the 's do not form a partition of
.
9. Consider the relation on
whose graph is shown
below. Is
an equivalence relation?
The relation is reflexive (all the diagonal points are filled in) and
symmetric (the graph is symmetric about the diagonal). However, it
isn't transitive: and
, but
. Therefore,
the relation is not an equivalence relation.
10. A relation is defined on by
Check each axiom for an equivalence relation. If the axiom holds, prove it. If the axiom does not hold, give a specific counterexample.
It may be helpful if you label the pairs by position:
Also, remember that
Let . Since
, it follows that
. Hence,
is reflexive.
Suppose and
. Then
Therefore, . Hence,
is symmetric.
Note that
However, , because
Therefore, is not transitive.
11. Prove that if n is a prime number and , then
or
.
Every integer is congruent mod 4 to 0, 1, 2, or 3.
Suppose n is prime and . Since n is an integer, n is congruent mod
4 to 0, 1, 2, or 3.
Suppose . Then
, contradicting the fact that
n is prime.
Suppose . Then
, where
. Thus,
, so n is even. Since
,
this contradicts the fact that n is prime.
It follows that or
. Both cases can
occur, since
and
(for example).
12. Prove that if , then
is either 1 or 2. Show by specific example that both cases can occur.
Dividing by
, I have
Now divides both
and
,
so it divides
. But the only
positive integers which divide 2 are 1 and 2. Hence,
is either 1 or 2.
If , I have
and
, and
.
If , I have
and
, and
.
These examples show that both cases can occur.
13. Compute . (Don't factor the numbers!)
Hence, .
14. Prove that if , then
.
and
, so
Since , it follows that
.
In general, if a linear combination of two integers is equal to 1, the two integers are relatively prime (their greatest common divisor is 1).
15. (a) Let m and n be integers. Prove that
(b) Prove that if , then
.
(a) First, and
. So
. Since
divides both
and n, it's a common divisor of
and n. Therefore, it must be less
than or equal to the greatest common divisor of
and n; that is,
Similarly, and
. So
Since divides both m and n, it's a common divisor of m and
n. Therefore, it must be less than or equal to the greatest
common divisor of m and n; that is,
The two inequalities I've proved combine to show that .
In words, the result of (a) says that the greatest common divisor of two numbers doesn't change if you replace the first number with the first number minus the second number. This provides a way of "simplifying" a greatest common divisor expression.
(b) Using the result of (a), I have
Now , so
. Therefore,
.
16. Show that if , then
does not
leave a remainder of 2 when it is divided by 5.
Consider n mod 5. There are 5 cases:
As the table shows, . Therefore,
does not leave a remainder of 2 when it is divided by
5.
17. (a) Find .
(b) Show that 8 does not have a multiplicative inverse mod 10.
(a) By trial and error, you can show that .
Therefore,
.
(b) Suppose for some x (so that
).
Multiplying both sides by 5, I get
This contradiction shows that 8 does not have a multiplicative
inverse mod 10.
18. Let m and n be integers, and suppose . Prove that
implies
.
Since , I have
for some integer p. If
, then
for some integer k. Substituting
yields
; this means that
, which is what I wanted to prove.
19. Suppose . Is it necessarily true that
?
No. , but
, while
.
20. Prove that if , then
is not
divisible by 5.
If , then n is congruent mod 5 to 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4. Take
cases:
Since , it follows that
for all
.
21. The following functions take real numbers as inputs and produce real numbers as outputs. Taking the domain to be the largest set of valid inputs, find the domain and the range for each function.
(a) .
(b) .
(c) .
(a) The domain is .
An even power can't be negative, so . On the other hand,
if
, then
Therefore, every is an output of f, and the range is
.
(b) The domain is . (Note that plugging 1 into
gives
, which is undefined.)
The range is , since if
,
(c) The domain is .
Note that
. This suggests that the range is
.
First, I'll show that is not in the range. Suppose it
is. Then for some x, I have
. So
This contradiction shows that there is no such x, so is
not in the range.
Next, I'll show if , then y is in the range. Since
, the quantity
is
defined. (I found it by setting
and
solving for x.) Moreover,
This proves that y is in the range.
Therefore, the range of f is .
22. Define by
. Prove directly using the
definition that f is injective.
23. Define by
. Prove that f is not
injective.
Thus, , but
. Hence, f is not
injective.
24. Define by
. Prove that f
is injective.
It would be difficult to do this directly. Instead, use derivatives:
Hence, f increases for all x, and hence f is injective.
25. Define by
. Prove that directly
using the definition that f is surjective.
Let . Then
Hence, f is surjective.
26. Define by
. Prove that f is
surjective.
Let . I must show that there is an
such that
.
Note that f is continuous, and
Hence, there are numbers c and d such that
By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there is a number x such that and
.
Therefore, f is surjective.
27. Define by
. Prove that f is injective.
Is f surjective?
Suppose . Then
Therefore, f is injective.
However, f is not surjective. For example, I'll show that there is no
such that
. For if
, then
The last equation is a contradiction, since for all x.
28. Define by
.
Prove that f is not injective, but that f is surjective.
First, and
, but
. Since
different inputs can give the same output, f is not injective.
To show that f is surjective, let . I have to find an input
such that
. There are many that work; here's
one:
Hence, f is surjective.
29. Define by
.
Prove that f is injective, but is not surjective.
First, suppose . Then
Equate the first components to get . Subtracting 1 from
both sides, I get
. Therefore, f is injective.
On the other hand, I'll show that there is no input x such that . Suppose on the contrary that
, so
. Equating the first components, I get
, so
. But equating the second components, I get
, so
. Since x can't be 2 and -4 simultaneously,
this is a contradiction, and there is no such x. Hence, f is not
surjective.
30. Define by
Is f surjective? Why or why not?
Suppose . Then
Equating the second components, I get , so
.
Equating the first components and plugging in
, I get
The last equation has no solutions.
Therefore, there is no pair such that
, and hence f is not surjective.
31. Define by
Prove that f is bijective by constructing an inverse.
First, I'll work backwards to guess the inverse. If , then
. So I'll set
and solve for x and y:
gives
, so
. Then
Thus, I'll define by
Next, I'll check that the inverse actually works. (This is the actual proof.)
Therefore, f and are inverses, and f is bijective.
32. Define by
Prove that f is bijective by constructing an inverse.
I'll work backwards to guess the inverse, then confirm my guess. If
, then
. So I'll set
and solve for x and y:
gives
. Then
Thus, I'll define by
Next, I'll check that the inverse actually works. (This is the actual proof.)
Therefore, f and are inverses, and f is bijective.
33. Let and
be functions. Suppose f and g are
injective. Prove that the composite
is injective.
Suppose that . I must show
.
I have
Therefore, is injective.
34. Give a specific example of sets X, Y, and Z and functions and
such that g is surjective, but the
composite
is not.
Let be defined by
. Let
be defined by
.
g is surjective, because if , then
However, is not surjective. In fact,
But since is an even power, it's always nonnegative. Therefore,
there is no
such that
.
35. Prove that the following sets have the same cardinality by constructing a bijection from A to B:
Note that is even for all
. (In the third case, if n is
odd, then
is odd, so
is even.)
In words, f sends 0 to 0, positive even numbers to themselves, and positive odd numbers to negative even numbers.
Define by
Note that for all
.
I'll show that f and g are inverses.
First, let . I must show
. There are 3 cases.
If , then
If and n is even, then
Finally, if and n is odd, then
Thus, in all cases .
Next, let . I must show that
. There are 3
cases.
If , then
If and n is even, then
If and n is even, then
is positive and odd. Hence,
Thus, in all cases .
Therefore, f and g are inverses. Hence, f is bijective. This proves
that .
36. Prove that has the same cardinality as
by constructing a bijection from
to
.
Define by
First, I have to show that f takes into
.
Suppose that
, so
. Then
Thus, .
Next, I'll show that f is bijective. I'll do this by constructing the
inverse. Set . Swapping x and y gives
. Solving for y, I get
Thus, . Note that if
, then
. Hence,
Thus, , and
takes
into
.
Check that the functions are inverses:
Thus, f and are inverses, f is bijective, that
.
37. Prove that has the same cardinality as
by constructing a bijection from
to
.
Define by
Note that if , then
Hence, .
Define by
If , then
Hence, .
I'll check that f and g are inverses.
Hence, f and g are inverses. Therefore, f is bijective. Thus, .
A very dangerous state of mind: thinking one understands. - Paul Valéry
Copyright 2020 by Bruce Ikenaga