If you restrict to the interval
, the function
increases:
This implies that the function is one-to-one, and hence it
has an inverse. The inverse is called the inverse
sine or arcsine function, and is denoted
or
. Note that
in the second case
does not
mean "
"!
Note: "Arcsine" (and ) are older
terms, and there is similar terminology for the other inverse trig
functions (so "arctangent" and
for the inverse tangent function, and so
on). I'll use the inverse function terminology instead.
In word, is the angle whose sine is
x. Another way of saying this is:
The fact that and
are inverse functions can be expressed by
the following equations:
Since the restricted takes angles in the
range
and
produces numbers in the range
,
takes numbers in the range
and produces angles in the range
.
Example. Compute and
.
Sine and arcsine are inverses, so they undo one another --- but you have to be careful!
can't be
, because
always returns
an angle in the range
.
Example. Find .
First, let . This
means that
. Now
, so
I get the following picture:
I got the adjacent side using Pythagoras: .
Using the triangle, I have
You can find a derivative formula for using implicit differentiation. Let
. This is equivalent to
. Differentiate implicitly:
I'd like to express the result in terms of x. Here's the right
triangle that says :
I found the other leg using Pythagoras. You can see that . Hence,
. That is,
Every derivative formula gives rise to a corresponding antiderivative formula:
Before I do some calculus examples, I want to mention some of the other inverse trig functions. I'll discuss the inverse cosine, inverse tangent, and inverse secant functions.
(a) You get the inverse cosine by inverting , restricted to
.
(b) You get the inverse tangent by inverting , restricted to
.
(c) You get the inverse secant by inverting , restricted to
together with
.
As with and
, the domains
and ranges of these functions and their inverses are
"swapped":
Example. Compute and
.
You can derive the derivative formulas for the other inverse trig functions using implicit differentiation, just as I did for the inverse sine function.
For example, I'll derive the formula for .
The derivation starts out like the derivation for . Let
, so
. Differentiating implicitly, I get
There are two cases, depending on whether or
.
Suppose . Then
is in the interval
, as illustrated in the first
diagram above. You can see from the picture that
Therefore,
, so x is positive, and
. Therefore,
Now suppose that . Then
is in the interval
, as illustrated in the second
diagram above. Since x is negative, the hypotenuse must be
, since it must be positive and since
must equal x. In this case,
Therefore,
, so x is negative, and
. Therefore,
This proves that in
all cases.
Example. Compute:
(a) .
(b) .
(c) .
(a)
(b)
(c)
I don't need absolute values in the last example, because is always positive.
Example. Prove the identity
Hence,
A function with zero derivative is constant, so
But when ,
Therefore,
Here are the integration formulas for some of the inverse trig
functions. I'm giving extended versions of the formulas --- with
" " replacing the "1" that
you'd get if you just reversed the derivative formulas --- in order
to save you a little time in doing problems.
For instance, here's how to derive the extended integral formula from the formula
using substitution:
Example. Compute and
.
Using the formula with
,
Using the formula with
,
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
Copyright 2018 by Bruce Ikenaga