You can use substitution to convert a
complicated integral into a simpler one. In these problems, I'll let
u equal some convenient x-stuff --- say . To complete the
substitution, I must also substitute for
. To do this, compute
, so
. Then
.
Example. Compute .
Here's what's going on. By the Chain Rule,
By the definition of antiderivative,
Now if , I have
So
The manipulations with and
are just a convenient
way of doing the substitution. These are not the same
"
" and "
" we used in
discussing differentials.
Example. Compute .
Example. Later on, I'll derive the integration formula
Use this formula to compute .
Example. Compute .
Notice that in the second step in the last example, the x's cancelled out, leaving only u's. If the x's had failed to cancel, I wouldn't have been able to complete the substitution.
But what made the x's cancel? It was the fact that I got an x from
the derivative of . This leads to the following rule
of thumb.
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
The next problem introduces a new idea. In some cases, to replace the x's with u's, you may need to solve the substitution equation for x.
Example. Compute .
There is no valid algebra which will allow me to multiply this out
--- unless I plan to multiply out !
I'll let , so
. If I stopped with that,
I'd have
I can't continue as-is, because I have both x's and u's in the integral.
To get rid of the x's, I solve the substitution equation for x, to get
. I can plug this into
to get everything in terms of u. Here's the work:
Example. Compute .
In this problem, after making the substitution , I solve the substitution equation for x to get
. Then I plug this into
to get rid of the
x's. Here's the work:
Copyright 2018 by Bruce Ikenaga