You can often tell that a series converges or diverges by comparing it to a known series. I'll look first at situations where you can establish an inequality between the terms of two series.
Theorem. ( Direct
Comparison) Let and
, be series with positive terms.
(a) If for all k and
converges, then
converges.
(b) If for all k and
diverges, then
diverges.
Proof. Let's look at the proof of (a). I know
that
converges; say
.
The partial sums of increase, since the series has positive terms.
Therefore, the partial sums are bounded above by S.
Since for all k, the partial sums
of
are
greater than or equal to the partial sums of
:
Hence, S is an upper bound for the partial sums of . Since those
partial sums form an increasing sequence that is bounded above, they
must have a limit. This means that
converges.
A similar idea works for (b). In that case, the partial sums are always bigger than the
partial sums, but the
partial sums go to
. Hence, the
partial sums go to
as well.
In the problems that follow, I'll often have to establish inequalities involving fractions. I need to know how a fraction changes if its top or its bottom is made bigger or smaller. The following table summarizes the ideas:
For example, take the fraction . If I change the top from "2" to
"3", I make the top bigger. The fraction changes from
to
, so the fraction has become bigger. If I
change the bottom from "3" to "2", I make the
bottom smaller. The fraction changes from
to
, so the fraction has become bigger.
Example. Determine whether
converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms. In fact, I could use the Integral
Test, but who would want to integrate ?
Instead, note that when k is large, the term should dominate. How does
compare to
? Well, if you make the bottom
smaller, the fraction gets bigger:
Now is a p-series with
, so it converges. Hence,
converges by comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
When n is large, the term is approximately
. This
is a term of the harmonic series, which diverges. So I suspect my
series diverges.
I have
I made the top smaller, then I made the bottom bigger; both cause the fraction to become smaller.
is
times the
harmonic series (minus the
and
terms), so it diverges. Hence,
diverges by Direct Comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
Since the top is bounded and the bottom is approximately for large n, the series terms "look
like"
, which is
the general term of a convergent geometric series. So I think my
series converges.
I'll use a familiar fact from trigonometry, then do algebra to "build up" the term of my series in the inequality.
The series is geometric with ratio
, so it converges. Hence, the original
series converges by direct comparison.
Example. Determine whether
converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms. Since ,
converges, because it's a p-series with
. Therefore,
converges by direct comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
If you make the top smaller, the fraction gets smaller:
Notice how I avoided changing to k; I changed it to something which
cancelled the radical on the bottom.
Now
diverges since it's harmonic. So
diverges, by comparison.
Note that Direct Comparison won't work if the inequalities go the
wrong way. For example, consider .
I'd like to compare this to
, but
if I make the bottom bigger (by adding 2), the fraction gets
smaller:
It's true that is a convergent p-series (
), but it's smaller than the given
series. I can't draw a conclusion this way.
Nevertheless, is "close to" the given
series in some sense. Limit Comparison will
make precise the idea that one series is "close to"
another, without having to worry about inequalities.
Theorem. ( Limit
Comparison) Let be a positive term series. Let
be a positive term
series whose behavior is known.
Consider the limiting ratio
(a) If the limit is a finite positive number, then the two series behave in the same way:
(i) If converges, then
converges.
(ii) If diverges, then
diverges.
(b) If the limit is 0 and converges, then
converges.
(c) If the limit is and
diverges, then
diverges.
The first case is the most important one, and the one I'll usually
use. Fortunately, it will work even if you accidentally write instead of
. The second and third cases
require that you get the fraction "right side up". The
phrase "finite positive number" means that in case (a), the
limit should not be 0 or
.
Proof. I'll sketch a proof in the first part of case (a). Suppose the limit is a finite positive number:
Suppose converges. Then there is a number n such that if
,
So for ,
Apply Direct Comparison to the series and
. The
series
converges, because
converges. Hence,
converges by Direct Comparison.
Therefore, converges as well.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms.
When k is large, the top and bottom are dominated by the terms with the biggest powers:
Compute the limiting ratio:
The limiting ratio is 1, a finite positive number. The series diverges, because it is harmonic. Hence, the series
diverges by Limit Comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms.
When k is large,
Compute the limiting ratio:
The limiting ratio is 1, a finite positive number. The series is
a convergent geometric series (since
). Therefore,
converges, by Limit Comparison.
Copyright 2019 by Bruce Ikenaga