You can often tell that a series converges or diverges by comparing it to a known series. I'll look first at situations where you can establish an inequality between the terms of two series.
Theorem. ( Direct Comparison) Let and , be series with positive terms.
(a) If for all k and converges, then converges.
(b) If for all k and diverges, then diverges.
Proof. Let's look at the proof of (a). I know that converges; say .
The partial sums of increase, since the series has positive terms. Therefore, the partial sums are bounded above by S.
Since for all k, the partial sums of are greater than or equal to the partial sums of :
Hence, S is an upper bound for the partial sums of . Since those partial sums form an increasing sequence that is bounded above, they must have a limit. This means that converges.
A similar idea works for (b). In that case, the partial sums are always bigger than the partial sums, but the partial sums go to . Hence, the partial sums go to as well.
In the problems that follow, I'll often have to establish inequalities involving fractions. I need to know how a fraction changes if its top or its bottom is made bigger or smaller. The following table summarizes the ideas:
For example, take the fraction . If I change the top from "2" to "3", I make the top bigger. The fraction changes from to , so the fraction has become bigger. If I change the bottom from "3" to "2", I make the bottom smaller. The fraction changes from to , so the fraction has become bigger.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms. In fact, I could use the Integral Test, but who would want to integrate ?
Instead, note that when k is large, the term should dominate. How does compare to ? Well, if you make the bottom smaller, the fraction gets bigger:
Now is a p-series with , so it converges. Hence, converges by comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
When n is large, the term is approximately . This is a term of the harmonic series, which diverges. So I suspect my series diverges.
I have
I made the top smaller, then I made the bottom bigger; both cause the fraction to become smaller.
is times the harmonic series (minus the and terms), so it diverges. Hence, diverges by Direct Comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
Since the top is bounded and the bottom is approximately for large n, the series terms "look like" , which is the general term of a convergent geometric series. So I think my series converges.
I'll use a familiar fact from trigonometry, then do algebra to "build up" the term of my series in the inequality.
The series is geometric with ratio , so it converges. Hence, the original series converges by direct comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms. Since ,
converges, because it's a p-series with . Therefore, converges by direct comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
If you make the top smaller, the fraction gets smaller:
Notice how I avoided changing to k; I changed it to something which cancelled the radical on the bottom.
Now diverges since it's harmonic. So diverges, by comparison.
Note that Direct Comparison won't work if the inequalities go the wrong way. For example, consider . I'd like to compare this to , but if I make the bottom bigger (by adding 2), the fraction gets smaller:
It's true that is a convergent p-series ( ), but it's smaller than the given series. I can't draw a conclusion this way.
Nevertheless, is "close to" the given series in some sense. Limit Comparison will make precise the idea that one series is "close to" another, without having to worry about inequalities.
Theorem. ( Limit Comparison) Let be a positive term series. Let be a positive term series whose behavior is known.
Consider the limiting ratio
(a) If the limit is a finite positive number, then the two series behave in the same way:
(i) If converges, then converges.
(ii) If diverges, then diverges.
(b) If the limit is 0 and converges, then converges.
(c) If the limit is and diverges, then diverges.
The first case is the most important one, and the one I'll usually use. Fortunately, it will work even if you accidentally write instead of . The second and third cases require that you get the fraction "right side up". The phrase "finite positive number" means that in case (a), the limit should not be 0 or .
Proof. I'll sketch a proof in the first part of case (a). Suppose the limit is a finite positive number:
Suppose converges. Then there is a number n such that if ,
So for ,
Apply Direct Comparison to the series and . The series converges, because converges. Hence, converges by Direct Comparison.
Therefore, converges as well.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms.
When k is large, the top and bottom are dominated by the terms with the biggest powers:
Compute the limiting ratio:
The limiting ratio is 1, a finite positive number. The series diverges, because it is harmonic. Hence, the series diverges by Limit Comparison.
Example. Determine whether converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms.
When k is large,
Compute the limiting ratio:
The limiting ratio is 1, a finite positive number. The series is a convergent geometric series (since ). Therefore, converges, by Limit Comparison.
Copyright 2019 by Bruce Ikenaga