For trig integrals involving powers of sines and cosines, there are two important cases:
1. The integral contains an odd power of sine or cosine.
2. The integral contains only even powers of sines and cosines.
I will look at the odd power case first. It turns out that the same idea can be used to integrate some powers of secants and tangents, so I'll digress to do some examples of those as well.
Example. Compute .
In this example, the key point was in the second line. I obtained an
integral with lots of 's and a single
. This allowed me to make the substitution
, because the
was available to
make
.
I got the by "pulling it off" the odd power
of
. Then I converted the rest of the stuff to
's using the identity
. This is the generic procedure when you have at
least one odd power of sine or cosine.
Example. Compute .
If you have an integral involving sines and cosines in which all the powers are even, the method I just described usually won't work. Instead, it is better to apply the following double angle formulas:
Any even power of or
can be expressed as
a power of
or
. Use the
identities above to substitute for
or
, and multiply out the result. The net effect is to
reduce the powers that occur in the integral,
while at the same time increasing the arguments (
).
Example. Compute .
Example. Compute .
I'll use the double angle formula (twice):
Example. Why would it be a bad idea to use the
double angle formulas to compute ?
Suppose I try to apply the double angle formula for cosine:
The integral can be done in this form, but you either need to apply
one of the angle addition formulas to or use
integration by parts. The problem is that having trig functions
with different arguments in the same integral makes the integral a
bit harder to do.
It would have been better to do the integral by using the "odd power" technique:
In some cases, you can use trig identities to do integrals involving sine and cosine. For example, the angle addition and subtraction formulas for cosine are
Add the two equations --- the terms cancel
--- and divide by 2:
The formula is
If instead you subtract the equation from
the
equation and divide by 2, you obtain
Likewise, the angle addition and subtraction formulas for sine are
Adding the equations and dividing by 2 gives
To summarize:
(a) .
(b) .
(c) .
You can use these identities to integrate products of sines and cosines with different arguments. (Note that you can also do these integrals using integration by parts.)
Example. Compute .
Using the formula for with
and
, I get
Note: If you wind up with a "negative angle" in applying the identities, you can get rid of it using the identities
To integrate some powers of secants and tangents, here are two useful approaches:
1. Use to convert the
integrand to something with lots of
's and a
single
. Then substitute
.
2. Use to convert the
integrand to something with lots of
's and a
single
. Then substitute
.
Example. Compute .
In this example, I pulled off a , then
converted the rest of the stuff to
's using
. The
was exactly what I needed to make
for the substitution
.
Notice that the argument did not play an important role in
the problem.
Example. Compute .
In this example, I pulled off a , then
converted the rest of the stuff to
's using
. The
was exactly what I nneded to make
for the substitution
.
Example. Compute .
I can do the first integral using , so
and
:
I can do the second integral using , so
and
:
Therefore,
Example. Compute .
In this problem, I'll use the identity
Applying this to the top of the fraction, I get
I used the formula
If you didn't know this, you could derive it by writing . Then substitute
.
I used to do
.
Example. Compute .
This integral uses a trick:
Example. Compute .
I can compute using parts:
Thus,
This integral also comes up a lot, so you should make a note of
it.
Remark. Using the methods of the last two examples, you can show:
In general, integrals involving powers of cosecant and cotangent use
the same ideas as integrals involving powers of secant and
tangent.
Example. Compute .
Remember the trig identity
So
The examples show that certain patterns that arise in trig integrals are good, in the sense that they allow you to do a substitution which makes the integral easy. Here is a review of some of the "good patterns":
(a) Lots of 's and a single
.
(b) Lots of 's and a single
.
(c) Lots of 's and a single
.
(d) Lots of 's and a single
.
(e) Lots of 's and a single
.
(f) Lots of 's and a single
.
You should aim for these patterns whenever possible.
Finally, I'll note that you can sometimes use integration by parts to obtain recursion formulas which reduce the integral of a power of a trig function to the integral of a smaller power.
Example. Derive a recursion formula for for
.
Integrate by parts:
After integrating by parts, I used the identity . I multiplied out the terms in
the integral, then broke the integral up into two integrals.
Next, add to both
sides of the equation:
The last equation is the recursion formula. It reduces the integral
of a power of sine to some stuff ( ) plus the integral of a power of sine that is
smaller by 2.
Here's how the formula would apply if :
Copyright 2019 by Bruce Ikenaga