| 
           
       | 
      
            
       | 
      
           
         Immunofluorescent staining of archenteron
         cells(all samples) 
          
         1. Allow 2 tubes of embryos to settle for 10 minutes. 
         Gently remove most of the
         liquid. 
         2. Add 200 ml 5C7 antibody (stains vegetal plate and
         archenteron) to one tube and 200 ml 10% 
         normal goat serum to the
         other. Let sit for 45 minutes at room temperature. Embryos
         will 
         settle. 
         3. Remove most of liquid. Add 1 ml ASW to wash. Allow to
         settle, remove liquid. 4. Add 200 ml 
         Fluorescein-congugated Goat
         anti-mouse IgG to both tubes. Let sit for 45 minutes at
         room 
         temperature. Embryos will
         settle. 
         5. Remove most of liquid. Add 1 ml ASW to wash., Allow to
         settle, remove liquid. Add 100 ml 
         PBS. 
         6. Transfer 10 ml of each sample to microscope slides. Check
         that there are embryos. 
         Coverslip. Examine using
         epifluorescence. 
         7. Observe differences from control. 
       | 
      
         
       | 
   
   
      | 
           
       | 
      
         
       | 
      
           
         Results 
          
         Throughout the course of
         our experiment, we observed our embryos at five different
         times. The first observation was made only 30 minutes
         after fertilization. The only sample that was not observed
         at this time was sample #4 because it was only irradiated 30
         minutes after fertilization. At this 30 minute mark, we saw
         normal development in the control. Cells were already
         beginning to undergo the first cleavage. The other two
         irradiated samples had not yet begun to cleave at this
         point. 
          
         After 5 hours, the control sample showed normal
         development at the blastula stage. Sample 2 exhibited a huge
         variance in stage. Some were halted after first cleavage,
         while others had divided several times. Most cells that did
         divide, had done so unevenly. Sample 3 exhibited many
         unusually small cleavages. Sample 4 contained cells that
         appeared to have divided anywhere from two to six times. The
         divisions in this sample were extremely
         irregular. 
       | 
      
         
       | 
      
         
       |